Celestial hemisphere:  Northern  ·  Constellation: Cygnus (Cyg)  ·  Contains:  HD191456  ·  HD191493  ·  HD191494  ·  HD191611  ·  HD191612  ·  HD191765  ·  HD191917  ·  HD192103  ·  HD228053  ·  HD228063  ·  LBN 182  ·  NGC 6883
Getting plate-solving status, please wait...
WR134 in HOO-RGB, Nicola Beltraminelli
Powered byPixInsight

WR134 in HOO-RGB

Getting plate-solving status, please wait...
WR134 in HOO-RGB, Nicola Beltraminelli
Powered byPixInsight

WR134 in HOO-RGB

Equipment

Loading...

Acquisition details

Loading...

Description

As already mentioned by many, WR134 is a Wolf-Rayet star located around 6,000 light years away from us in the constellation of Cygnus. the star is surrounded by a faint bubble nebula blown by the intense radiation and fast wind from the star. It is five times the radius of the sun, but due to a temperature over 63,000 K it is 400,000 times as luminous as the sun (Wikipedia). The shell is over forty parsecs wide and contains about 1,830 solar masses of hydrogen (Wikipedia).

I am definitely fascinated by this kind of deep sky objects revealing the complex nature of stars and their life. I therefore shooted this very peculiar star/nebula with the intent to show the faint oxygen shell already illustrated by brillant astrophotographers. With this in mind I was aware of the challenge to capture the faint regions of the shell (in particular with a scope with an F ratio of 6.8 and only 180mm diameter), thus I did push the system at the maximum of my current capabilities by dedicating 4 nights only for the oxygen channel and by combining captures of 300s, 600s and 900s. Thanks to the excellent performances of my GM2000 HPSII mount I could avoid autoguiding however I have to say that 900s is really the maximum I can currently do (rejection of 1 sub out of 3). The final image was obtained by combining the Ha and OIII signals using an own developed method enabling to detect the transitions between OIII and Ha.

I very slightly sharpened the image and denoised the low emitting regions to avoid too much noise. Compared to the original image I couldn't notice any artefacts and this was confirmed by comparing the final image with the ones already published.

As usual don't esitate to provide feedback and suggestions.

CS!

Nicola

Comments